Check it out. You just can't make this stuff up !
Then perhaps the author of that post should read this unsolicited email (copy shown below) from the owner of stereonet who decided in the end to make up his own legal letter full of vexatious and baseless allegations as well as threats of jail sentences and then send it to me in a last ditched failed attempt to have me remove incriminating evidence that was written by someone else, when all of his lawyers threats to date to have me remove this evidence against his website had failed ! That's right, that is what he does. If he can't silence you by banning you on his own forum his tentacles will reach out to other forums to try and have you silenced and/or removed. Guy's so tell me who really is the unhinged one here ??
And just to set the record straight there was only one complaint from all of the first gen Preamps I had sold to date and that was from a diyaudio member who had ulterior motives and was in bed with a local amplifier manufacturer that was building amp modules with dubious input stages so this poster is making stuff up about us. The irony was that I didn't want to sell a Preamp to this guy in the first place because I had had other inquiries way before him but he kept pestering me to sell him one which I did in the end and I paid a very heavy price with this guy He was nothing but trouble from the day he got the Preamp as well as being totally uncooperative in chasing down the problems. And what wasn't apparent to me at the time of these continued complaints canvassed on the diyaudio forum was why this so-called offender would not return the Preamp to me for at least 6 months and/or with one of his problematic diy amplifiers so I could evaluate the actual problem in the lab. Well it appears the Preamp wasn't in his possession for some time as evidenced by pictures of his setup on diyaudio. In fact in the end, I realized they were trying to cobble together their own DSP based Preamp by copying ideas from mine and incorporating that in an outdated DAC/DSP/Preamp they used to sell whilst at the same time trying to put me out of business by spreading malicious lies. Sound familiar ?? In end I did end up getting one of these amps from someone else who was building one and wanted me to check it out for them. Guess what ? The amp and my Preamp worked flawlessly together with no problems. I guess that's why they did not want to send me one of their amps to test it with This is what they do here in this country and before people start throwing stones in glass houses they need to get their facts straight because there is a lot that goes on in this industry behind closed doors that is purposely hidden on that stereonet forum and nobody can speak out and say anything for fear of being banned and having their posts censored or removed
Not only that, when I did get the Preamp back I gave it the once over and on-sold it immediately to someone else overseas who hasn't complained about it since ! Apparently all of this makes me unhinged !! Having said that, according to this audiogeek member on stereonet if you produce a product and later find out some things that could have been done better because of the lack of information in a chip vendors datasheet etc you shouldn't be given a second chance but a vendor like DEQX who has been peddling the same old bit of rope and substandard equipment to the punters for decades, should be given a second chance always. Well guess what, they got caught out !! For all of this time they couldn't even be bothered upgrading their first generation SHARC DSP to a 4th gen part as used in the UP and you know why ? Because they knew they could get away with it and nobody would question it until I exposed it. But it never ever occurred to me to use a part introduced decades ago back in 1996 and not recommended for new designs ! I just used the best I could get at the time and brought myself up to speed on it even if I had to go through some revisions and iterations to get there. Now they have been caught out like a rabbit in a spot light and they are playing catch up games, and if it wasn't for what I published on this forum they would still be selling the same old bit of rope to unsuspecting punters like AudioGeek. If telling the truth and attempting to defend my name makes me "unhinged" then that is a noble title to be had !
And then there was their lame excuse for not offering a stereo 4-way capable DSP crossover which the UP is. I think it went like this:- "Who needs anymore than a 3-way speaker ?". Erm ever heard of a Duntech Sovereign or Dunlavy SC-V or SC-VI or are You going to tell us Dunlavy didn't know what he was doing ?
And sorry to disappoint those people if I come across as "unhinged", contrary to your opinions, we did take another bite from the cherry and produced a second generation Preamp, and the new measurements don't lie. We nailed it but let's keep waiting for the DEQX revolution because why ?? An aussie past time to kill off another prospective manufacturer on stereonet and then replace it with yet more imports. That's what they do here
Then perhaps the author of that post should read this unsolicited email (copy shown below) from the owner of stereonet who decided in the end to make up his own legal letter full of vexatious and baseless allegations as well as threats of jail sentences and then send it to me in a last ditched failed attempt to have me remove incriminating evidence that was written by someone else, when all of his lawyers threats to date to have me remove this evidence against his website had failed ! That's right, that is what he does. If he can't silence you by banning you on his own forum his tentacles will reach out to other forums to try and have you silenced and/or removed. Guy's so tell me who really is the unhinged one here ??
And just to set the record straight there was only one complaint from all of the first gen Preamps I had sold to date and that was from a diyaudio member who had ulterior motives and was in bed with a local amplifier manufacturer that was building amp modules with dubious input stages so this poster is making stuff up about us. The irony was that I didn't want to sell a Preamp to this guy in the first place because I had had other inquiries way before him but he kept pestering me to sell him one which I did in the end and I paid a very heavy price with this guy He was nothing but trouble from the day he got the Preamp as well as being totally uncooperative in chasing down the problems. And what wasn't apparent to me at the time of these continued complaints canvassed on the diyaudio forum was why this so-called offender would not return the Preamp to me for at least 6 months and/or with one of his problematic diy amplifiers so I could evaluate the actual problem in the lab. Well it appears the Preamp wasn't in his possession for some time as evidenced by pictures of his setup on diyaudio. In fact in the end, I realized they were trying to cobble together their own DSP based Preamp by copying ideas from mine and incorporating that in an outdated DAC/DSP/Preamp they used to sell whilst at the same time trying to put me out of business by spreading malicious lies. Sound familiar ?? In end I did end up getting one of these amps from someone else who was building one and wanted me to check it out for them. Guess what ? The amp and my Preamp worked flawlessly together with no problems. I guess that's why they did not want to send me one of their amps to test it with This is what they do here in this country and before people start throwing stones in glass houses they need to get their facts straight because there is a lot that goes on in this industry behind closed doors that is purposely hidden on that stereonet forum and nobody can speak out and say anything for fear of being banned and having their posts censored or removed
Not only that, when I did get the Preamp back I gave it the once over and on-sold it immediately to someone else overseas who hasn't complained about it since ! Apparently all of this makes me unhinged !! Having said that, according to this audiogeek member on stereonet if you produce a product and later find out some things that could have been done better because of the lack of information in a chip vendors datasheet etc you shouldn't be given a second chance but a vendor like DEQX who has been peddling the same old bit of rope and substandard equipment to the punters for decades, should be given a second chance always. Well guess what, they got caught out !! For all of this time they couldn't even be bothered upgrading their first generation SHARC DSP to a 4th gen part as used in the UP and you know why ? Because they knew they could get away with it and nobody would question it until I exposed it. But it never ever occurred to me to use a part introduced decades ago back in 1996 and not recommended for new designs ! I just used the best I could get at the time and brought myself up to speed on it even if I had to go through some revisions and iterations to get there. Now they have been caught out like a rabbit in a spot light and they are playing catch up games, and if it wasn't for what I published on this forum they would still be selling the same old bit of rope to unsuspecting punters like AudioGeek. If telling the truth and attempting to defend my name makes me "unhinged" then that is a noble title to be had !
And then there was their lame excuse for not offering a stereo 4-way capable DSP crossover which the UP is. I think it went like this:- "Who needs anymore than a 3-way speaker ?". Erm ever heard of a Duntech Sovereign or Dunlavy SC-V or SC-VI or are You going to tell us Dunlavy didn't know what he was doing ?
And sorry to disappoint those people if I come across as "unhinged", contrary to your opinions, we did take another bite from the cherry and produced a second generation Preamp, and the new measurements don't lie. We nailed it but let's keep waiting for the DEQX revolution because why ?? An aussie past time to kill off another prospective manufacturer on stereonet and then replace it with yet more imports. That's what they do here